Skip to the content
Home
What We Do
Resources
Our Team
Home
What We Do
Resources
Our Team
Home
What We Do
Resources
About Us
Login
Home
What We Do
Resources
About Us
Login
Mentoring Form
Session Mentoring
Report
Hey Mentor, Hope you had a productive session! Waiting to hear your highlights!
Not Available
CMCA Session Mentoring
Name of the Observer / Visitor
*
Name of the Observer / Visitor
First Name
First Name
Last Name
Last Name
Email
*
What was the purpose of your visit?
*
Session Mentoring - (Mentoring is a system of semi-structured guidance whereby one person shares their knowledge, skills and experience to assist others to progress in their own lives and careers)
Hand-holding - (the provision of careful support or guidance to someone during a learning process or a period of change)
General visit - (to observe a session, experience the classroom setting and program implementation)
Mode of Observation
*
Live Session / In-Person Visit
Video Recording
Program Name
*
Bengaluru Non DoE Clubs
Chikamagalur Affordable Clubs
DoM Teacher Led Clubs
Evolveback Clubs
Hosur
Kanchipuram Clubs
KREIS Clubs
Mumbai BMC Clubs
Mumbai Private Clubs
Nagpur
Pune
Ramnagara Clubs
Shirpur
Date of Session Observation
*
Name of CMCA Educator (CE)
*
Gender of the CMCA Educator
*
School / College Name
*
Which intervention did you observe?
*
Club Content
CMCA Junior Workshops (Grades 5, 6,7)
CMCA Senior Workshops (Grades 9,10, 11, 12)
Catalyse Workshop Sessions
MGS Session
Session Name
Was the feedback shared with the CMCA Educator?
*
Yes
No
Not Yet
Fairness
arrowup6
CE / facilitator showed favoritism during the session
Example: Always choosing the same set of students to answer questions.
*
Yes
No
The CE/facilitator sometimes resorted to preaching, lecturing, or giving moral lessons.
Example: Lecturing students for incorrect answers like “bullying is okay.”
*
Yes
No
The CE / facilitator involved the class in resolving issues
*
Yes
No
Not Applicable
The CE/facilitator treated all students with respect and avoided sarcasm or insults when responding.
*
Always
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
The CE/facilitator was receptive to students’ ideas and adopted some of them.
Example: Student-led campaign ideas
*
Yes
No
Not Applicable
The CE/facilitator engaged quiet or non-participating students effectively.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
Conduct
arrowup6
The CE/facilitator was punctual and arrived well in time for the session.
*
Yes
No
The CE/facilitator expressed personal biases, stereotypes, or made unwarranted references to caste, class, gender, or race.
*
Yes
No
The CE/facilitator ignored or avoided challenging questions by students.
*
Yes
Sometimes
No
The CE/facilitator was unable to handle students
*
Yes
Sometimes
No
The CE/facilitator expressed frustration, cynicism, or negativity during the session.
*
Yes
No
The CE/facilitator used repetitive words, gestures, or mannerisms that were distracting.
Example: Saying “you know” often, fiddling with objects.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator used humor positively to engage the class.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator’s voice modulation was clear and appropriate for the class.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
The session was conducted at an appropriate pace — crisp and to the point.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator effectively managed group work as prescribed.
*
Yes
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator moved around the class and maintained eye contact with all students.
*
To a great Extent
Somewhat
No
Content
arrowup6
The CE/facilitator had all necessary materials ready and organized.
Example: Flashcards, forms, xeroxes, letters, etc.
*
Yes
No
The CE / facilitator was well prepared for the session
*
To a Great Extent
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator carried the content guide into the classroom.
Note: This is discouraged.
*
Yes
No
The CE/facilitator used preparation cards effectively.
*
Yes
No
The CE/facilitator used required flashcards, aids, and handouts as indicated.
*
To a great extent
Sometimes
No
Not Applicable
The CE/facilitator followed the module — using suggested questions, completing content, and capturing key activity aspects.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
Engagement
arrowup6
Students’ initial response to the CE/facilitator was positive.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator asked questions effectively — encouraged multiple responses and gave students time to think and reply.
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
The CE/facilitator maintained students’ attention through interactive and creative methods.
*
Very often
Sometimes
Rarely
The CE/facilitator managed classroom behavior effectively and positively.
Example: Addressed distractions or disruptions calmly and constructively.
*
Very Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Ripples of Change
arrowup6
Did the CE/facilitator take time to check or remind students about Ripples of Change (RoC) stories during the session?
*
Yes
No
Not Applicable
Skip
Did the RoC discussion generate excitement or enthusiastic responses from students?
*
Yes
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
Did the CE/facilitator encourage and applaud the efforts shared by students (if any)?
*
Yes
No
Did the CE/facilitator spend enough time to discuss or address any concerns raised by students during this exchange?
*
To a great extent
Somewhat
No
Please use the space below for any other thoughts or observations you'd like to add
Submit
If you are human, leave this field blank.
Δ
